Union and Its Territory

Articles 1 to 4, placed under Part I of the Constitution, define the nature of the Indian Union and lay down the rules governing its territorial composition. These provisions settle two foundational questions: what India is called, and how its territory can be altered.

---

The Name Question

The Constituent Assembly could not reach a consensus on what to call the country. One faction favoured the ancient name Bharat, while another preferred the modern international name India. The deadlock was resolved by adopting both names — 'India, that is, Bharat' — giving constitutional standing to each.

Union vs. Federation

Article 1 designates India a 'Union of States', not a 'Federation of States'. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar explained this choice on two grounds:

1. The Indian Union was not formed by an agreement among pre-existing sovereign states, unlike the American federation.
2. States in India have no right to secede from the Union.

The Union is therefore described as indestructible. States exist purely for administrative convenience — the country is an integral whole that has been divided, not a collection of units that have come together.

Three Categories of Indian Territory

Under Article 1, the territory of India encompasses:

• Territories of the States (listed in the First Schedule)
• Union Territories (also listed in the First Schedule)
• Territories that may be acquired by the Government of India at any future time

Key Distinction: 'Territory of India' is broader than 'Union of India'. The Union of India covers only states (which share legislative and executive powers with the Centre), while Territory of India additionally includes union territories and acquired territories — both of which are directly administered by the Central government.

Acquisition of Foreign Territory

As a sovereign state, India can acquire territory through modes recognised by international law: cession (by treaty, purchase, gift, lease or plebiscite), occupation of hitherto unoccupied areas, conquest, or subjugation. Territories acquired after 1950 include Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Daman and Diu, Puducherry, and Sikkim.

---

Article 2 — Admission or Creation of New States

Parliament is empowered to admit (states already in existence outside India) or establish (entirely new states not previously in existence) new states on whatever terms and conditions it considers appropriate.

• Article 2 deals with states not yet part of the Union of India.
• Article 3, by contrast, deals with internal rearrangement of existing constituent states.

Article 3 — Reorganisation of Existing States

Parliament can:

• Form a new state by separating territory from any state, by uniting two or more states (or parts thereof), or by merging territory into a part of any state
• Increase or diminish the area of any state
• Alter the boundaries of any state
• Rename any state

Procedural Conditions:

1. The reorganisation Bill must be introduced in Parliament only on the prior recommendation of the President.
2. Before recommending it, the President must refer the Bill to the concerned state legislature for its views within a specified time.
3. However, neither the President nor Parliament is bound by those views — they may accept or reject them.
4. A fresh reference to the state legislature is not required each time an amendment is moved in Parliament.
5. For a union territory, no legislative reference is needed — Parliament can act directly.

India — 'An Indestructible Union of Destructible States'

The Constitution does not guarantee the territorial integrity or continued existence of any state. Parliament can unilaterally redraw state boundaries or even abolish a state. The Union, however, is indestructible.

This contrasts sharply with the USA, where the federal government cannot alter state boundaries without the concerned state's consent — making it 'an indestructible union of indestructible states'.

Article 4 — Ordinary Law Sufficient

Laws passed under Articles 2 and 3 are not considered constitutional amendments under Article 368. They can therefore be passed by a simple majority through the ordinary legislative process — not the special majority needed for constitutional amendments.

---

A major constitutional issue arose when the Central government decided to transfer the Berubari Union territory (West Bengal) to Pakistan. The Supreme Court (1960) held that Parliament's power under Article 3 to diminish state areas does not include ceding Indian territory to a foreign country. Such cession requires a constitutional amendment under Article 368.

Consequently, the 9th Constitutional Amendment Act (1960) was enacted to transfer Berubari to Pakistan.

In contrast, the Supreme Court ruled in 1969 that settling a boundary dispute with another country does not require a constitutional amendment — it can be done by executive action since no cession of territory is involved.

100th Constitutional Amendment Act (2015) — India-Bangladesh Land Boundary

This amendment gave effect to the Land Boundary Agreement between India and Bangladesh:

• India transferred 111 enclaves to Bangladesh; Bangladesh transferred 51 enclaves to India.
• The deal also covered adverse possessions and demarcation of a 6.1-km undemarcated border stretch.
• The amendment modified the First Schedule provisions relating to four states: Assam, West Bengal, Meghalaya and Tripura.

Background: The India–East Pakistan boundary was set by the Radcliffe Award (1947), partly revised by the Bagge Award (1950), and addressed again by the Nehru-Noon Agreement (1958). The 9th Amendment (1960) could not be operationalised for former East Pakistan. The 1974 India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement and its 2011 Protocol finally resolved the outstanding issues.

---

At Independence (1947)

India comprised two categories of political units:

• British Provinces — under direct British rule
• Princely States — under native princes, subject to British paramountcy

Of 552 princely states within India's geographic boundaries, 549 joined India voluntarily. Three holdouts — Hyderabad, Junagarh, and Kashmir — were eventually integrated:

• Hyderabad — by police action
• Junagarh — by referendum
• Kashmir — by Instrument of Accession

1950 Constitution — Four-fold Classification

The original Constitution classified states into four categories:

Total: 29 units.

---

S.K. Dhar Commission (1948)

Appointed in June 1948 to assess linguistic reorganisation, the Dhar Commission submitted its report in December 1948 and recommended reorganisation based on administrative convenience, not language. This triggered widespread resentment.

JVP Committee (1948–49)

The Indian National Congress formed its own committee comprising Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel and Pattabhi Sitaramayya (hence JVP). It submitted its report in April 1949 and formally rejected language as the basis for state reorganisation. Notably, the JVP Committee had no chairman or convenor.

Creation of Andhra — First Linguistic State (1953)

Despite the rejection of linguistic basis, popular agitation — particularly the death of Potti Sriramulu after a 56-day hunger strike — forced the government's hand. In October 1953, Andhra State was carved out of Madras State, separating Telugu-speaking areas. It was India's first linguistic state; Kurnool was its capital and the High Court was at Guntur.

Fazl Ali Commission (1953–55)

Appointed in December 1953, this three-member States Reorganisation Commission was chaired by Fazl Ali, with K.M. Panikkar and H.N. Kunzru as members. Its September 1955 report:

• Broadly accepted language as a basis for reorganisation
• Rejected the 'one language–one state' formula
• Identified four guiding factors: (a) national unity and security; (b) linguistic and cultural homogeneity; (c) financial, economic and administrative viability; (d) welfare of people and the nation
• Recommended abolition of the four-fold classification; creation of 16 states and 3 centrally administered territories

States Reorganisation Act and 7th Constitutional Amendment (1956)

The government accepted the Commission's recommendations with minor changes. The 7th Constitutional Amendment Act (1956) and the States Reorganisation Act (1956) together:

• Abolished the distinction between Part A and Part B states
• Abolished Part C states (merging some into adjacent states, converting others into union territories)
• Part D effectively disappeared with Andaman and Nicobar Islands becoming a union territory
• Created 14 states and 6 union territories effective 1 November 1956

---

Special Note: Sikkim's Unique Path

• Pre-1947: Indian princely state under Chogyal
• Post-1947: 'Protectorate' of India (India handled defence, external affairs, communications)
• 1974: 35th Constitutional Amendment Act made Sikkim an 'associate state' (new Article 2A + new Tenth Schedule)
• 1975: Referendum voted to abolish Chogyal's rule and merge with India
• 36th Constitutional Amendment Act (1975): Made Sikkim the 22nd full state; inserted Article 371-F; repealed Article 2A and the Tenth Schedule added in 1974

Special Note: Meghalaya's Path

• 22nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1969) first created Meghalaya as an 'autonomous state' or 'sub-state' within Assam — with its own legislature and council of ministers
• This did not satisfy aspirations; full statehood granted in 1972

Haryana-Punjab Split — Shah Commission

The demand for a 'Sikh Homeland' (Punjabi Subha) by the Akali Dal under Master Tara Singh led to the Punjab Reorganisation Act (1966). The Shah Commission recommended:

• Punjabi-speaking areas -> State of Punjab
• Hindi-speaking areas -> State of Haryana
• Hill areas -> merged with Himachal Pradesh UT

---

Note: Delhi was redesignated as NCT without being made a full state.

---

• 1953: Andhra State created (first linguistic state) from Madras State
• 1956: Telugu areas of Hyderabad merged with Andhra -> enlarged Andhra Pradesh; capital shifted to Hyderabad
• 2014: Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act bifurcated it into Telangana (29th state) and residuary Andhra Pradesh
  • Hyderabad: joint capital for both states for up to 10 years
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court renamed Hyderabad High Court (common until AP gets a separate HC)

---

---

• 'Union of States' vs 'Federation of States' — Ambedkar's two reasons; indestructible Union
• 'Territory of India' vs 'Union of India' — broader vs narrower concept
• Article 3 procedure — President's recommendation, state legislature's views (not binding), no fresh reference needed for amendments
• Article 4 — simple majority sufficient; not an amendment under Article 368
• Berubari case — cession needs Article 368 amendment; boundary settlement does not
• 100th Amendment — India-Bangladesh enclave exchange; 4 states affected
• Dhar -> JVP -> Fazl Ali — progression of linguistic reorganisation
• Potti Sriramulu — his death triggered first linguistic state (Andhra, 1953)
• Fazl Ali Commission's four factors — frequently tested
• 7th Amendment + States Reorganisation Act, 1956 — 14 states, 6 UTs
• Sikkim's journey — protectorate -> associate state (35th Amendment) -> full state (36th Amendment)
• India = 'indestructible union of destructible states' vs USA = 'indestructible union of indestructible states'