Emergence of Gandhi: From South Africa to Rowlatt Satyagraha

The First World War ended in 1918, but instead of bringing promised rewards, it deepened India's economic wounds and political frustrations. Post-war India was a tinderbox — impoverished peasants, unemployed workers, disillusioned soldiers, and a politically aware middle class — all waiting for a spark. That spark came in the form of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, returning to India in 1915 armed with a tested philosophy and technique of resistance.

Understanding Gandhi's emergence requires understanding three overlapping narratives: (1) the structural grievances that fuelled nationalist resurgence, (2) Gandhi's political schooling in South Africa, and (3) his early Indian campaigns that built mass confidence before the climactic Rowlatt crisis of 1919.

---

Long-Term Causes

• Post-war economic hardship: Wartime taxation, inflation, and post-war recession hit every class — industrialists faced foreign competition, workers faced unemployment, peasants faced high taxes, and returning soldiers found an impoverished homeland.
• Broken promises: Indians (including Gandhi) had cooperated with British war efforts expecting political rewards. The Montford Reforms (1919) were seen as tokenistic, not substantive.
• Global anti-imperialist wave: The Paris Peace Conference (1919) revealed that Allied promises of "self-determination" applied only to European peoples, not colonies. Simultaneously, militant nationalism surged across Turkey, Egypt, Ireland, China, Korea, and Southeast Asia.

Immediate Triggers

• Impact of the Russian Revolution (November 7, 1917): The Bolsheviks' overthrow of the Czarist regime and their renunciation of imperialist rights in Asia sent a powerful message — that organised masses could defeat mighty rulers. It inspired radicals and alarmed the British.
• Rowlatt Act (March 1919): This was the final betrayal — instead of rewards, Indians received draconian laws that permitted imprisonment without trial.

---

The British response to nationalist demands came in two contradictory forms: limited reform as carrot, and repression as stick.

Key Features of Montford Reforms

Provincial Level — Introduction of Dyarchy

Subjects were divided into two lists:

• Reserved subjects (law and order, finance, land revenue, irrigation) — administered by the Governor through his Executive Council of bureaucrats, NOT accountable to the legislature.
• Transferred subjects (education, health, local government, agriculture) — administered by ministers elected from and responsible to the Legislative Council.

The Governor retained overriding power over both lists. Ministers could be bypassed; the Governor could take over transferred subjects if "constitutional machinery failed."

Central Level — No Responsible Government

• Governor-General remained supreme executive authority.
• Bicameral legislature introduced: Central Legislative Assembly (lower house, 145 members) and Council of State (upper house, 60 members).
• 75% of the central budget remained non-votable.
• Three Indians included in the Viceroy's Executive Council of eight.

Other Provisions

• Women were given the right to vote.
• Communal and class electorates were further entrenched.
• Secretary of State for India was henceforth paid from the British exchequer (not Indian revenues).

Drawbacks

• Limited franchise: Electorate extended to only ~1.5 million out of a population of ~260 million.
• Dyarchy was unworkable: "Reserved" subjects like finance, police, and justice were withheld from elected ministers, making governance irrational.
• No central accountability: The central executive remained entirely unaccountable to the legislature.
• Constant friction: Ministers had no control over finances or the bureaucracy; the Governor could overrule ministers on any matter.

Reactions

• Congress (August 1918, Bombay, under Hasan Imam) called it "disappointing and unsatisfactory."
• Tilak: "unworthy and disappointing — a sunless dawn."
• Annie Besant: "unworthy of England to offer and India to accept."
• Gandhi: The reforms were "only a method of further draining India of her wealth."

---

Background

Gandhi arrived in South Africa in 1893 for a legal case involving Dada Abdullah. Witnessing systematic racial discrimination against Indians — who could not vote, were restricted to insanitary locations, and faced humiliation daily — he decided to stay and organise resistance.

Indian immigrants in South Africa fell into three groups:

1. Indentured labourers (mainly from South India, post-1890, on sugar plantations)
2. Merchants (mostly Meman Muslims who followed the labourers)
3. Ex-indentured labourers who had settled permanently after their contracts expired

Phase 1: Moderate Struggle (1894–1906)

Gandhi used petitions and memorials to British authorities, hoping that once informed of Indian grievances, the authorities would act. He founded the Natal Indian Congress and launched the newspaper Indian Opinion to unite different sections of Indians.

Phase 2: Satyagraha Phase (1906–1914)

Satyagraha against Registration Certificates (1906): A new law required all Indians to carry registration certificates with fingerprints at all times. Gandhi formed the Passive Resistance Association and led Indians in defying this law. After arrests and deceit by the government, Indians publicly burned their registration certificates — a dramatic act of protest. This was the first instance of Satyagraha (devotion to truth).

Campaign against Migration Restrictions: Indians defied laws restricting movement between provinces; many were jailed.

Campaign against Poll Tax and Marriage Invalidation: A poll tax of three pounds was levied on ex-indentured workers. Simultaneously, a Supreme Court ruling invalidated non-Christian marriages, rendering Hindu, Muslim, and Parsi marriages illegal and their children illegitimate. Women were drawn into the movement in large numbers because of this indignity.

Protest against the Transvaal Immigration Act: Indians illegally crossed from Natal into Transvaal. Miners and plantation workers went on a lightning strike. In India, Gokhale mobilised public opinion; even Viceroy Lord Hardinge condemned the repression.

Tolstoy Farm (1910): Gandhi established this commune (named by associate Herman Kallenbach after the Russian writer) to house families of satyagrahis. It followed the earlier Phoenix Farm (1904, inspired by John Ruskin's Unto This Last). Both farms combined manual labour with education, instilling values of dignity, service, and community.

Compromise (1914): Negotiations involving Gandhi, Lord Hardinge, C.F. Andrews, and General Smuts produced an agreement abolishing the poll tax, recognising Indian marriages, and addressing registration certificates.

Gandhi's Lessons from South Africa

• Masses possessed immense capacity for sacrifice when moved by a just cause.
• He could unite diverse groups — different religions, classes, men, and women — under a single leader.
• Leaders sometimes have to take unpopular decisions even among their supporters.
• He developed and tested his own style of politics, leadership, and non-violent resistance.

---

Gandhi synthesised elements from Indian tradition, Christian ethics (turning the other cheek), and Tolstoyan philosophy (countering evil through non-violent resistance) to create Satyagraha.

Core Principles:

• A satyagrahi never submits to what is wrong but remains truthful, non-violent, and fearless.
• Methods include non-payment of taxes, boycott, and withdrawal of cooperation.
• Suffering is accepted as proof of commitment to truth.
• No ill will is harboured toward the wrongdoer — hatred is alien to Satyagraha.
• Only the brave could practise it; it was explicitly NOT for cowards. Even violence was considered preferable to cowardice.
• Ends could never justify the means — thought and action must be inseparable.

---

Gandhi returned to India in January 1915. He toured the country for a year, observing conditions without taking political positions — as advised by his mentor Gokhale. He was critical of moderate politics and also wary of the Home Rule agitation (then led by Tilak and Besant) as untimely given the ongoing war.

Champaran Satyagraha, 1917 — First Civil Disobedience

Background: European indigo planters in Bihar's Champaran district forced peasants to grow indigo on 3/20th of their land under the tinkathia system. When synthetic German dyes replaced indigo, planters extracted high rents and illegal dues to maximise profits before peasants could switch crops.

Course: Rajkumar Shukla invited Gandhi to investigate. Gandhi, accompanied by Rajendra Prasad, Mazhar-ul-Haq, Mahadeo Desai, Narhari Parekh, and J.B. Kripalani, reached Champaran. The authorities ordered him to leave; Gandhi defied the order and was prepared to face punishment. This act of civil disobedience was novel and forced the government to back down. A committee was formed; Gandhi was made a member. The tinkathia system was abolished and peasants received partial compensation (25% of illegal dues). Within a decade, planters left the region.

Other key figures: Brajkishore Prasad, Anugrah Narayan Sinha, Ramnavmi Prasad, Shambhusharan Varma.

Ahmedabad Mill Strike, 1918 — First Hunger Strike

Background: Mill owners of Ahmedabad wanted to discontinue the plague bonus. Workers demanded a 50% wage hike to cope with wartime inflation; owners offered 20%. Workers struck.

Course: Anusuya Sarabhai (social worker and sister of mill owner Ambalal Sarabhai) sought Gandhi's intervention. Gandhi advised workers to demand 35% and remain non-violent. When negotiations stalled, Gandhi undertook a fast unto death (his first) — not to coerce the owners but to strengthen workers' resolve. The fast also pressured owners. An arbitration tribunal was accepted; it awarded workers a 35% wage hike. Anusuya Sarabhai later founded the Ahmedabad Textile Labour Association (1920).

Kheda Satyagraha, 1918 — First Non-Cooperation

Background: The 1918 drought caused crop failure in Kheda, Gujarat. Under the Revenue Code, if yield fell below one-fourth of normal, farmers were entitled to remission. The government refused.

Course: Gandhi called for non-payment of taxes. But the practical leadership came from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Narahari Parikh, Mohanlal Pandya, and Ravi Shankar Vyas. Even when property was seized, the farmers' discipline held. Neighbouring Gujaratis sheltered relatives of protesters; those who bought confiscated land were socially ostracised. The government agreed to suspend taxes for the year and the next, reduce rate increases, and return confiscated property.

The Kheda struggle produced a new political consciousness among the peasantry — linking local grievances to the broader question of national independence.

---

The Act

Officially called the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act, 1919, it was based on the recommendations of the Rowlatt Commission (headed by British judge Sir Sidney Rowlatt). The Act allowed:

• Arrest without warrant on suspicion of "treason."
• Trial without jury; imprisonment without trial.
• Trials in secrecy without legal representation.
• A panel of three High Court judges as the sole tribunal — no appeal beyond it.
• Evidence not admissible under the Indian Evidence Act was acceptable.
• The law of habeas corpus was effectively suspended.

All elected Indian members of the Imperial Legislative Council — including Mohammed Ali Jinnah, Madan Mohan Malaviya, and Mazhar ul Haq — voted against it. Overruled by official nominees, they resigned in protest.

Gandhi called it the "Black Act" — arguing that collective punishment for isolated political crimes was morally indefensible.

Satyagraha Against Rowlatt Act — First Mass Strike

Gandhi organised a Satyagraha Sabha and planned a nationwide hartal (strike) with fasting, prayer, and civil disobedience. It was to begin on April 6, 1919.

Before it could begin, anti-British violence broke out in Calcutta, Bombay, Delhi, Ahmedabad, and especially Punjab (where wartime repression, forced recruitment, and disease had created an explosive environment). April 1919 witnessed the most intense anti-British upsurge since 1857.

---

Sequence of Events

• April 9: Two nationalist leaders — Saifuddin Kitchlew and Dr Satyapal — were arrested without provocation for addressing protest meetings.
• April 10: Thousands gathered to show solidarity; police opened fire; some protesters were killed; five Englishmen were killed in the ensuing riots; English missionary Marcella Sherwood was assaulted.
• Troops under Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer were deployed to restore order.
• April 13 (Baisakhi day): Dyer issued a proclamation banning gatherings. Thousands — mostly from neighbouring villages, unaware of the ban — assembled at Jallianwala Bagh for the Baisakhi festival. A protest meeting also happened to be underway.

The Massacre

Dyer arrived with troops, blocked the only exit, and opened fire on the crowd without warning and without issuing a dispersal order. 1,650 bullets were fired. British sources counted 379 dead and ~1,100 wounded; the Congress estimated ~1,000 dead and ~1,500 wounded. Dyer later stated he did not tend to the wounded as it was "not his job" and that his aim was to produce a "moral effect" throughout Punjab.

Martial law followed: public floggings, forced crawling, and humiliations were inflicted on Amritsar's inhabitants.

Consequences

• Rabindranath Tagore renounced his knighthood in protest.
• Gandhi gave up his Kaiser-i-Hind title; he withdrew the Rowlatt Satyagraha on April 18.
• Gandhi declared cooperation with a "satanic regime" was now impossible — the path to the Non-Cooperation Movement was opened.
• Bhagat Singh (age 11 at the time) was profoundly shaped by the massacre.
• Udham Singh (who took the name Ram Mohammad Singh Azad) assassinated Lt. Governor Michael O'Dwyer in revenge; he was hanged in 1940; his ashes returned to India in 1974.
• Dyer's honouring by clergy at the Golden Temple (Arur Singh declaring him a Sikh) intensified the demand for Gurdwara reform, leading to the Gurdwara Reform Movement.

Hunter Committee of Inquiry

Announced October 14, 1919. Chaired by Lord William Hunter. Included three Indian members: Sir Chimanlal Harilal Setalvad, Pandit Jagat Narayan, and Sardar Sahibzada Sultan Ahmad Khan.

The final report (March 1920) unanimously condemned Dyer — lack of warning was an error; the length of firing was a grave error; his aim to produce a "moral effect" was to be condemned. The Indian minority report additionally stated the innocent character of the crowd and called Dyer's actions "inhuman and un-British."

No legal action was taken — the government had already passed an Indemnity Act protecting its officers. Dyer was simply relieved of command in March 1920. In England, Winston Churchill condemned the massacre in the House of Commons; H.H. Asquith called it "one of the worst outrages in our history." Yet the House of Lords passed a motion supporting Dyer, and the Morning Post raised £26,000 for him (Rudyard Kipling being a notable contributor).

The Congress formed its own inquiry committee: Motilal Nehru, C.R. Das, Abbas Tyabji, M.R. Jayakar, and Gandhi.

---

• Jallianwala Bagh was, in historian A.J.P. Taylor's words, "the decisive moment when Indians were alienated from British rule."
• Gandhi's evolution — from moderate petitioner in South Africa, to civil resister in Champaran, to organiser of mass strikes — reached its culmination here. He now saw non-violent mass resistance as the only path.
• The Rowlatt crisis demonstrated that the British could not be trusted; constitutionalism alone was insufficient. Mass mobilisation through Satyagraha became the dominant nationalist strategy.
• The episode permanently oriented the national movement toward the masses — peasants, artisans, and the urban poor — as the engine of change.

---

• GS Paper I — Modern History: Directly connects to the evolution of the national movement, Gandhi's philosophy, and the transition from moderate to mass politics.
• Nationalism and Colonialism: The post-WWI disillusionment illustrates how colonialism generates contradictions — it promises inclusion but delivers repression, thereby radicalising the colonised.
• Social Change: Champaran (peasant rights), Ahmedabad (labour rights), and Kheda (agrarian grievances) show how Gandhi linked social and economic justice with political independence.
• Continuity and Change: The Rowlatt Act represents colonial continuity (wartime powers made permanent); Gandhi's Satyagraha represents rupture — introducing a new political grammar.
• Role of Women: The invalidation of Indian marriages in South Africa and Anusuya Sarabhai's role in Ahmedabad signal the emerging inclusion of women in the national movement.
• Global Comparisons: The Russian Revolution ↔ Indian nationalism linkage shows how global events reconfigured colonial resistance worldwide.

---

• Tinkathia system: It required indigo cultivation on 3/20 (not 1/5 or 1/3) of the land. Do not confuse with the Champaran Agrarian Act (1918) which formally abolished it.
• Ahmedabad strike demand: Workers initially demanded 50%; Gandhi negotiated this down to 35% (not 50%, not 25%). The tribunal awarded 35%.
• Kheda vs Champaran: Champaran = First Civil Disobedience; Kheda = First Non-Cooperation. These "firsts" are frequently swapped in options.
• Hunter Committee: Its formal name was the Disorders Inquiry Committee. It investigated disturbances in Bombay, Delhi, and Punjab — not just Amritsar.
• Who resigned over Rowlatt Act?: All elected Indian members, including Jinnah, Malaviya, and Mazhar ul Haq — not just Congress members.
• Udham Singh vs Bhagat Singh: Udham Singh assassinated O'Dwyer (in 1940, in London). Bhagat Singh was inspired by the massacre but killed Saunders (in connection with the Lala Lajpat Rai episode in 1928).
• Tolstoy Farm vs Phoenix Farm: Phoenix Farm (1904, Natal, inspired by Ruskin); Tolstoy Farm (1910, named by Kallenbach, inspired by Tolstoy). Both were in South Africa.
• Dyarchy was introduced at the provincial level under the 1919 Act, NOT at the centre.
• Council of State: Had only male members and a 5-year term. Central Legislative Assembly had a 3-year term and included women.
• Montford Reforms date: Announced July 1918; Government of India Act passed 1919. Do not confuse the announcement date with the Act's passage.
• April 6 vs April 13: Rowlatt Satyagraha was planned for April 6; Jallianwala Bagh massacre was on April 13 (Baisakhi).

---

• Gandhi born: October 2, 1869, Porbandar, Kathiawar (Gujarat).
• Natal Indian Congress + Indian Opinion → Gandhi's South Africa organisation and newspaper.
• Satyagraha born: 1906, against Registration Certificates law.
• Phoenix Farm (1904) → Tolstoy Farm (1910).
• Gandhi returned to India: January 1915.
• Champaran (1917): tinkathia abolished; Rajkumar Shukla invited Gandhi.
• Ahmedabad (1918): Gandhi's first fast; 35% wage hike; Anusuya Sarabhai.
• Kheda (1918): Vallabhbhai Patel's field leadership; tax suspension.
• Rowlatt Act: March 1919; "Black Act"; Jinnah, Malaviya, Mazhar ul Haq resigned.
• Jallianwala Bagh: April 13, 1919; 1,650 bullets; Dyer; 379 dead (official); Kitchlew and Satyapal arrested April 9.
• Tagore: renounced knighthood. Gandhi: gave up Kaiser-i-Hind.
• Hunter Committee: October 1919; Dyer relieved March 1920; Indemnity Act protected officers.
• Udham Singh: assassinated O'Dwyer; hanged 1940; ashes returned 1974.