Constitutional, Administrative and Judicial Developments

The East India Company began in 1600 as a trading body, but after Buxar (1764) and the grant of Diwani rights (1765), it became a territorial power. The period from Company rule to Crown rule saw a long sequence of constitutional, administrative and judicial changes. These were designed for imperial control, yet they also introduced elements of the modern state: rule of law, codified legislation, representative institutions, centralised administration, provincial devolution and modern public services.

---

Context of Dual Government (1765-72)

After Buxar, the Company held Diwani rights but used Indian deputy diwans such as Mohammad Reza Khan in Bengal and Raja Shitab Rai in Bihar. The system produced authority without responsibility for the Company and responsibility without authority for Indian officials. Corruption, revenue extraction, peasant oppression and Company bankruptcy followed.

Regulating Act, 1773

The Regulating Act was the first British government intervention to regulate Company affairs in India. It recognised that the Company was no longer merely a trading corporation. It introduced centralised administration through a Governor-General and Council of four for Bengal, with Warren Hastings as the first Governor-General. The directors had to submit revenue, civil and military correspondence to the British government, giving the British Cabinet control over Indian affairs for the first time. It also established the Supreme Court at Calcutta with original and appellate jurisdiction.

The 1781 amendments clarified Supreme Court jurisdiction: it would operate within Calcutta, personal law of the defendant would be followed, government servants were protected for official acts, and social and religious usages were to be honoured.

Pitt's India Act, 1784

This Act used the term British possessions for Company territories for the first time. It created the Board of Control, consisting of Crown-appointed members, to supervise civil, military and revenue affairs. The Board and Court of Directors together created a dual system of control. The Governor-General's council was reduced to three, including the Commander-in-Chief, and Bombay and Madras were made subordinate to the Governor-General.

Act of 1786

Cornwallis was allowed to combine the offices of Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief. He was also given power to override his council if he accepted personal responsibility. This override power was later extended to all Governors-General.

Charter Act, 1793

The Company's privileges were renewed for 20 years. Royal approval was required for appointment of the Governor-General, Governors and Commander-in-Chief. Senior officials could not leave India without permission. The Company could issue country trade licences, paving the way for opium trade with China. Revenue administration was separated from judiciary and maal adalats disappeared. A major injustice was that Home Government members were to be paid from Indian revenues, a burden that continued until 1919.

Charter Act, 1813

The Company's monopoly over Indian trade ended, though China trade and tea monopoly continued. The constitutional position of British territories in India was explicitly defined for the first time. One lakh rupees annually was set aside for education, literature and science, and Christian missionaries were permitted to come to India.

Charter Act, 1833

The Company's China and tea monopoly ended, so the Company ceased to be a trading body. The Act brought complete financial, legislative and administrative centralisation. The Governor-General could superintend all civil and military affairs; Madras and Bombay lost legislative powers except a right to propose laws. A Law Member was added to the Governor-General's Council. Indian laws were to be codified and consolidated. The Act declared that no Indian citizen should be denied employment on grounds of religion, colour, birth or descent, though this was not implemented in practice. Slavery was abolished in 1843.

Charter Act, 1853

The Company's possession of territories was continued unless Parliament decided otherwise. The Court of Directors was reduced to 18. The Company's patronage over civil services ended and recruitment was opened to competitive examination. The Law Member became a full member of the Governor-General's Executive Council. Executive and legislative functions were further separated, six additional legislative members were added, and local representation entered the Indian legislature.

Act for Better Government of India, 1858

After the 1857 revolt, India was transferred from Company rule to Crown rule. India would be governed in the name of the Crown through a Secretary of State and a Council of 15. The dual system created by Pitt's India Act ended. The Governor-General became Viceroy, a title that enhanced prestige more than authority. In substance, this was a formal transfer of power from a Company that had already become subordinate to the British state.

---

Indian Councils Act, 1861

The Act accepted non-official representatives in legislative bodies and made law-making no longer exclusively executive. Lord Canning introduced the portfolio system, laying the foundation for cabinet government in India. Legislative powers were restored to Bombay and Madras and could be extended to other provinces, marking the beginning of legislative devolution. But councils had little real power: they could not control the budget, discuss executive action freely or legislate without approval.

Indian Councils Act, 1892

The Act expanded non-official membership and introduced the principle of representation through recommendations by universities, district boards, municipalities, zamindars, trade bodies and chambers of commerce. It avoided the word election but accepted indirect election in practice. Members could express views on financial statements and ask questions with six days' notice.

Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms)

The reforms attempted to add a representative and popular element. The Imperial Legislative Council was enlarged. Satyendra Prasad Sinha became the first Indian member of the Governor-General's Executive Council as Law Member. The most important and dangerous provision was separate electorates for Muslims, with Muslim representation in excess of population and lower income qualification than Hindu voters. This institutionalised communal division.

Government of India Act, 1919

The August 1917 declaration promised gradual responsible government within the British Empire, but Parliament retained control over timing and pace. The Act created a bicameral central legislature: Council of State and Legislative Assembly, both with directly elected majorities but very limited franchise. Separate electorates were extended to Sikhs, Christians and Anglo-Indians. Dyarchy was introduced in provinces: reserved subjects under executive councillors and transferred subjects under Indian ministers. Separate central and provincial budgets were introduced. A High Commissioner for India was appointed in London for six years. The Secretary of State was now paid from the British Exchequer, ending the 1793 injustice. Dyarchy ultimately failed.

Simon Commission and Round Table Process

The Simon Commission was appointed in November 1927, two years before schedule. It had no Indian member and was boycotted. Its 1930 report recommended abolition of dyarchy, responsible government in provinces, federation of British India and princely states, and continuation of communal electorates. Three Round Table Conferences followed. The White Paper of 1933 and Joint Parliamentary Committee under Lord Linlithgow shaped the Government of India Act, 1935.

Government of India Act, 1935

With 451 clauses and 15 schedules, this was the longest Act. It proposed an All-India Federation of provinces and princely states, but the federation never materialised because the princely states did not accede. Dyarchy was introduced at the centre but never operated. A bicameral federal legislature, three legislative lists, residuary powers with the Governor-General, a Federal Court and extended communal electorates were provided. Provincial dyarchy was abolished and provincial autonomy introduced from April 1, 1937. Provinces derived power directly from the Crown, had independent financial powers and could borrow on their own security. Bicameral legislatures were provided in six provinces: Madras, Bombay, Bengal, UP, Bihar and Assam. Franchise rose to about 10 percent of the population. The Act was unanimously rejected by Congress, which demanded a Constituent Assembly elected on adult franchise. The operative part continued until August 15, 1947.

---

Cornwallis is called the founder of civil services in India. He raised salaries, enforced rules against private trade, barred gifts and bribes, and introduced promotion by seniority. Wellesley founded Fort William College in 1800 for training recruits; in 1806 it was replaced by East India College at Haileybury in England.

The Charter Act of 1853 ended Company patronage and opened recruitment to competitive examination. The Indian Civil Service Act, 1861 kept the exam in England, in English, with Greek and Latin bias. The maximum age was reduced from 23 in 1859 to 19 in 1878 under Lytton. Satyendra Nath Tagore became the first Indian to qualify for the ICS in 1863.

Lytton introduced the Statutory Civil Service in 1878-79, reserving one-sixth of covenanted posts for Indians of high families through nomination, but it failed. The Aitchison Committee of 1886 recommended dropping covenanted and uncovenanted labels and classifying services as Imperial, Provincial and Subordinate. The House of Commons supported simultaneous exams in 1893, but this was never implemented.

The Montford reforms supported more Indian recruitment, recommending simultaneous examination and one-third recruitment in India, rising by 1.5 percent annually. The Lee Commission of 1924 recommended 50:50 parity between Europeans and Indians in ICS direct recruitment within 15 years and immediate establishment of a Public Service Commission. The 1935 Act provided for Federal and Provincial Public Service Commissions, but effective control remained British.

---

Pre-British policing was fragmented: faujdars handled law and order, amils revenue, kotwals urban policing, and zamindars rural policing. Cornwallis organised a regular police system in 1791, with thanas under darogas and an SP at district level, relieving zamindars of police duties. Mayo appointed divisional SPs with spies in 1808. Bentinck abolished the office of SP between 1828 and 1835, making the collector-magistrate head police in his jurisdiction.

The Indian Police Act, 1861, based on the Police Commission of 1860, created a civil constabulary with Inspector-General, Deputy Inspector-General and district SP. The Police Commission of 1902 recommended CID in provinces and a Central Intelligence Bureau. The police was used to suppress the national movement and remained alienated from the public. The British never created a true All-India Police; the 1861 Act only gave provincial guidelines.

---

Before 1857, there were Queen's troops and Company troops. After 1857, the army was reorganised to prevent another revolt, defend India against imperial rivals and use Indian troops for expansion in Asia and Africa. The proportion of Europeans was raised to about one-third, with a 1:2 ratio in the Bengal Army and 2:5 in Madras and Bombay. Europeans monopolised artillery and other key arms. Indians were denied high ranks: until 1914 the highest rank was subedar, and commissioned ranks opened only from 1918.

Divide and rule shaped recruitment. The 1879 Army Commission emphasised using natives against natives. Lord Roberts popularised the martial races theory, favouring Sikhs, Gurkhas and Pathans, while groups linked with 1857 such as Awadh, Bihar, Central India and South India were labelled non-martial. Caste and communal companies were encouraged, and soldiers were isolated from nationalist publications.

---

Mayor's Courts in Madras, Bombay and Calcutta in 1726 began the common law system in India. Warren Hastings created District Diwani Adalats for civil disputes and District Fauzdari Adalats for criminal disputes. The Supreme Court at Calcutta under the Regulating Act tried British subjects within Calcutta and often clashed with Company courts.

Cornwallis separated revenue and justice. District Fauzdari Courts were abolished and Circuit Courts set up at Calcutta, Dacca, Murshidabad and Patna. The collector was stripped of magisterial powers and confined to revenue administration. A gradation of civil courts was created, from Munsiff's Court to King-in-Council. The Cornwallis Code established sovereignty of law, made officials answerable to civil courts and brought European subjects under jurisdiction.

Bentinck abolished Circuit Courts and transferred functions to collectors under commissioners. Sadar Diwani and Sadar Nizamat Adalats were set up at Allahabad for Upper Provinces. Persian was replaced in courts: suitors could use Persian or vernacular, and English replaced Persian in the Supreme Court. The 1833 Law Commission under Macaulay led to codification: Civil Procedure Code (1859), Indian Penal Code (1860) and Criminal Procedure Code (1861). In 1865, Supreme Courts and Sadar Adalats were merged into High Courts at Calcutta, Bombay and Madras. The 1935 Act provided for the Federal Court, established in 1937.

---

After 1858, central control was exercised through the Secretary of State and advisory Council of 15. The Viceroy had an Executive Council, but the Secretary of State in London concentrated real authority and increased British industrial and financial influence over Indian policy.

Provincial government revived gradually after the 1861 Act. Bombay, Madras and Calcutta had Governors with Executive Councils; other provinces had Lieutenant Governors or Chief Commissioners. Financial decentralisation began under Mayo in 1870, when fixed sums were assigned to provinces for police, jails, education, medical services and roads. Lytton transferred more heads such as land revenue, excise, general administration and law and justice. In 1882, revenues were divided into general, provincial and shared categories.

Local bodies were developed because overcentralisation created financial difficulty, civic services were needed, nationalism raised welfare demands and British policy hoped local administration would check politicisation. Early local bodies from 1864-68 were nominated and treated as tax collection instruments. Mayo's Resolution of 1870 began local finance. Ripon's Resolution of 1882 made local bodies instruments of political education, called for non-official majorities, non-official chairpersons, elections where possible and minimal official interference. Ripon is therefore called the Father of Local Self-Government in India.

Curzon increased official control. The Royal Commission on Decentralisation (1908) recommended stronger village panchayats, sub-district boards and municipal responsibility for primary education. The 1918 resolution called for real authority in representative local bodies. Under the 1919 Act, local self-government became a transferred subject, but finance remained reserved. The 1935 Act gave more impetus because finance came under popular ministries, but local taxation remained weak.

---

• GS Paper II - Polity and Governance: The 1935 Act anticipated the Federal Court, legislative lists and federal-provincial structure of modern India.
• Local Government: Ripon's 1882 Resolution is the historical ancestor of the 73rd and 74th Amendments.
• Civil Services: Cornwallis, the 1853 competitive exam, Lee Commission and Public Service Commissions show the colonial origin of modern bureaucracy.
• Communalism: Separate electorates under Morley-Minto (1909) institutionalised communal politics.
• Military and Nationalism: Martial races theory explains why the RIN revolt of 1946 was so significant.
• Judiciary and Rule of Law: Cornwallis Code's sovereignty of law and official accountability anticipate modern judicial review and rule of law.

---

• Regulating Act 1773: first British government intervention, Governor-General and Council of 4, Supreme Court, first Cabinet control.
• Pitt's India Act 1784: Board of Control, British possessions, council reduced to 3, Bombay and Madras subordinate.
• Constitutional position of British territories explicitly defined first in Charter Act 1813.
• Law Member added in 1833, but became a full member only in 1853.
• India trade monopoly ended in 1813; China trade and tea monopoly ended in 1833.
• Satyendra Prasad Sinha was first Indian in Governor-General's Executive Council; Satyendra Nath Tagore was first Indian to pass ICS.
• Dyarchy: provinces in 1919, centre in 1935, provinces abolished in 1935.
• Simon Commission was appointed in 1927, two years early, and reported in 1930.
• Federal Court was provided in 1935 and established in 1937.
• High Commissioner for India was created under 1919 Act, distinct from Secretary of State.
• Statutory Civil Service was nomination-based, not exam-based, and failed.
• Martial races theory is associated with Lord Roberts.
• Mayor's Courts of 1726 began common law institutions in India.
• Mayo's 1870 resolution began local finance; Ripon's 1882 resolution gave political education, elections and non-official majorities.
• Cornwallis Code established sovereignty of law; Bentinck replaced Persian in courts.
• High Courts came in 1865; Federal Court came in 1937.
• Home Government payment from Indian revenues began in 1793 and was rectified by 1919.

---

Company-era milestones: 1773 Regulating Act; 1784 Pitt's India Act; 1786 Cornwallis override; 1793 Charter Act; 1813 India trade monopoly ends; 1833 Company ceases trade; 1853 competitive exams; 1858 Crown rule.

Crown-era milestones: 1861 portfolio system and legislative devolution; 1892 indirect election and questions; 1909 separate electorates and S.P. Sinha; 1919 dyarchy in provinces and High Commissioner; 1935 All-India Federation plan, provincial autonomy, three lists and Federal Court.

Services and administration: Cornwallis organised civil service; Fort William College (1800); Haileybury (1806); ICS competition (1853); Satyendra Nath Tagore (1863); Statutory Civil Service (1878-79); Aitchison (1886); Lee Commission (1924); Public Service Commissions under 1935.

Judiciary and local government: Mayor's Courts (1726); Hastings adalats; Cornwallis Code; Bentinck and Macaulay Law Commission; High Courts (1865); Federal Court (1937); Mayo local finance (1870); Ripon local self-government (1882).