Polity · Non-Constitutional Bodies
This chapter covers the global context of grievance redressal institutions (Ombudsman, Administrative Courts, Procurator System), the origin and features of the Swedish Ombudsman, India's existing anti-corruption framework, the ARC's recommendations for Lokpal and Lokayukta, the decade-long legislative journey culminating in the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013, its key features and drawbacks, and the structural and functional variations of Lokayukta institutions across Indian states.
Modern welfare states assign the government a central role in socio-economic development. This inevitably expands bureaucracy and multiplies administrative processes, concentrating discretionary power in the hands of civil servants. When this discretion is misused—through harassment, malpractices, maladministration, or corruption—it generates citizens' grievances against administration. The effectiveness of democracy itself depends on how well such grievances are addressed.
Three major institutional models have emerged globally to handle this challenge:
The institution of Ombudsman was first established in Sweden in 1809 — making it the oldest democratic grievance-redressal institution in the world. The word 'Ombud' is a Swedish term meaning a representative or spokesman of another person.
Scholar Donald C. Rowat, an international authority on the Ombudsman, defines it as: "an officer appointed by the legislature to handle complaints against administrative and judicial action." He also describes it as a "uniquely appropriate institution for dealing with the average citizen's complaints about unfair administrative actions."
Gerald E. Caiden called the Ombudsman an "institutionalised public conscience," while Rowat elsewhere termed it a "bulwark of democratic government against the tyranny of officialdom."
The Swedish Ombudsman deals with citizens' complaints in five areas:
| Power | Details |
|---|---|
| Suo motu action | Can investigate on his own initiative, without a complaint |
| Complaints-based action | Can act on a complaint received from any citizen |
| Prosecution | Can prosecute any erring official, including judges |
| File access | Uninterrupted access to all administrative files |
| No power to punish | Cannot directly inflict punishment; reports to higher authorities |
| No power to quash | Cannot reverse or quash any administrative decision |
| No direct control | Has no direct control over administration or courts |
| Country | Year | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1809 | World's first Ombudsman |
| Finland | 1919 | Spread to Scandinavia |
| Denmark | 1955 | Spread to Scandinavia |
| Norway | 1962 | Spread to Scandinavia |
| New Zealand | 1962 | First Commonwealth country – Parliamentary Commissioner for Investigation |
| United Kingdom | 1967 | Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration |
More than 40 countries have since adopted Ombudsman-like institutions with varying nomenclatures and functions. India's equivalent is called Lokpal (at the Centre) and Lokayukta (at the state level).
French Administrative Courts System: A unique institutional device for redressing citizens' grievances against administrative authorities. Its success in France led to its adoption in several European and African countries, including Belgium, Greece, and Turkey.
Procurator System: Used in socialist countries such as the former USSR (Russia), China, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania. The office of the Procurator-General continues to function in Russia. The Procurator-General is appointed for a tenure of seven years.
Before the Lokpal Act 2013, India already had 26 institutional mechanisms to check corruption and redress citizens' grievances. Key ones include:
The Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) of India (1966–1970), headed by Morarji Desai, submitted a special interim report in 1966 on the 'Problems of Redressal of Citizens' Grievances.' It recommended establishing two special institutions:
Despite government acceptance of ARC recommendations, ten attempts to legislate a Lokpal Bill failed:
| Sl. | Year | Government | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | May 1968 | Congress (Indira Gandhi) | Lapsed — Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 2 | April 1971 | Congress (Indira Gandhi) | Lapsed — Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 3 | July 1977 | Janata (Morarji Desai) | Lapsed — Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 4 | August 1985 | Congress (Rajiv Gandhi) | Lapsed — Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 5 | December 1989 | National Front (VP Singh) | Withdrawn by government |
| 6 | September 1996 | United Front (Deve Gowda) | Lapsed — 11th Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 7 | August 1998 |
Key pattern: Bills 1–4 lapsed due to Lok Sabha dissolution. Bill 5 and Bill 9 were withdrawn by respective governments.
1. Dual Structure: Establishes Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayukta at the state level — creating a uniform anti-corruption road map nationwide.
2. Composition: Chairperson + maximum 8 members; at least 50% must be judicial members.
3. Representation: At least 50% of members must come from SC, ST, OBC, minorities, or women.
4. Selection Committee: Comprises —
5. Search Committee: Assists the Selection Committee; 50% of Search Committee must also be from SC/ST/OBC/minorities/women.
6. Prime Minister under Jurisdiction: PM is included within Lokpal's jurisdiction but with subject matter exclusions and a specific process for handling PM-related complaints.
7. Coverage of Public Servants: All Groups A, B, C, and D employees of Central Government are covered. For Groups C and D, the CVC investigates under its own powers, subject to Lokpal reporting and review.
8. Superintendence over CBI: Lokpal has power of superintendence and direction over the CBI for cases referred by it.
9. Director of CBI: A High-Powered Committee chaired by the PM recommends the Director of CBI.
10. Asset Attachment: Provision for attachment and confiscation of property acquired through corrupt means, even while prosecution is pending.
11. Strict Timelines:
12. Enhanced Punishments:
13. Institutional Jurisdiction: Institutions fully or partly financed by government are under Lokpal's jurisdiction; aided institutions are excluded.
14. Protection for Honest Officers: Adequate safeguards for upright public servants.
15. Prosecution Sanction: Lokpal is empowered to grant sanction for prosecution in place of the government or competent authority.
16. CBI Strengthened:
17. Foreign Funding: All entities receiving foreign donations exceeding Rs. 10 lakh per year under FCRA are under Lokpal's jurisdiction.
18. State Lokayuktas: States must establish Lokayuktas through state legislation within 365 days of the Act's commencement. States have freedom to determine the contours of their Lokayukta mechanism.
By 2013, 22 states and 1 Union Territory (Delhi) had established Lokayukta institutions. Key milestones:
Chronological order of establishment:
Odisha (1970) → Maharashtra (1971) → Rajasthan (1973) → Bihar (1974) → Uttar Pradesh (1975) → Madhya Pradesh (1981) → Andhra Pradesh (1983) → Himachal Pradesh (1983) → Karnataka (1985) → Assam (1985) → Gujarat (1986) → Punjab (1995) → Delhi (1995) → Kerala (1999) → Jharkhand (2001) → Chhattisgarh (2002) → Haryana (2002) → Uttarakhand (2002) → J&K (2002) → West Bengal (2003) → Tripura (2008) → Goa (2011)
The structure of Lokayukta is not uniform across states:
Lokayukta (and Upalokayukta) are appointed by the Governor of the state. In most states, the Governor consults:
Exceptions:
Chief Minister:
Members of State Legislature:
Ministers and Higher Civil Servants:
Local Bodies and Corporations:
| Scope | States |
|---|---|
| Both grievances (maladministration) AND allegations (corruption) | Maharashtra, UP, Assam, Bihar, Karnataka |
| Only allegations (corruption) — NOT grievances | Himachal Pradesh, AP, Rajasthan, Gujarat |
| Theme | Key Fact |
|---|---|
| First Ombudsman | Sweden, 1809 |
| First Commonwealth country | New Zealand, 1962 |
| UK Ombudsman | Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, 1967 |
| ARC headed by | Morarji Desai |
| Lokpal bills introduced | 10 times (1968–2011); only 10th became law |
| Bill 5 & Bill 9 | Withdrawn (not lapsed) |
| Constitution Amendment for Lokpal | 116th Amendment Bill — NOT passed |
| Lokpal composition | Chairperson + max 8 members; 50% judicial; 50% SC/ST/OBC/women |
| PM under Lokpal | Yes, with subject-matter exclusions |
| Suo motu — Lokpal | Cannot; can Lokayukta (most states) |
| First state to enact Lokayukta law | Odisha (1970) |
Next action
You can practise without an account. Sign in first if you want this chapter saved.
This chapter covers Why Grievance Redressal Institutions Matter, The Ombudsman System, Other Global Systems, India's Existing Grievance Redressal Framework, Lokpal: ARC Recommendations. It is organized as revision-ready notes followed by a linked practice quiz.
For Ombudsmen of the Republic: Lokpal, Lokayuktas, and India's Institutional Anti-Corruption Framework, focus on definitions, dates, places, institutions, distinguishing features, and factual comparisons in the chapter. Then use the quiz to check recall and identify gaps.
Use the Ombudsmen of the Republic: Lokpal, Lokayuktas, and India's Institutional Anti-Corruption Framework chapter headings to organize an answer framework. Connect causes, consequences, comparisons, examples, and evidence wherever the notes provide them instead of memorizing isolated facts.
| BJP coalition (Vajpayee) |
| Lapsed — 12th Lok Sabha dissolved |
| 8 | August 2001 | NDA (Vajpayee) | Lapsed — 13th Lok Sabha dissolved (2004) |
| 9 | August 2011 | UPA (Manmohan Singh) | Withdrawn by government |
| 10 | December 2011 | UPA (Manmohan Singh) | Eventually passed as the 2013 Act |
| First operational Lokayukta |
| Maharashtra (1971) |
| J&K equivalent | State Accountability Commission (SAC) |
| Lokayukta tenure | 5 years or 65 years, no reappointment |
| Lokayukta recommendations | Advisory, not binding |
| CM under Lokayukta | HP, AP, MP, Gujarat (included); Maharashtra, UP, Rajasthan, Bihar, Odisha (excluded) |