Polity · Constitutional Framework
A comprehensive study of the 17 defining features of the Indian Constitution — from its unmatched length and diverse borrowings to its federal-unitary blend, parliamentary system, fundamental rights, secularism, and three-tier governance — along with the major criticisms levelled at the document.
The Indian Constitution is exceptional in its scope and spirit. While it draws heavily from the constitutional traditions of many countries, it synthesises these influences into a document uniquely suited to India's social, historical, and political conditions. The original Constitution adopted in 1949 has been substantially shaped by subsequent amendments — notably the 7th, 42nd, 44th, 73rd, 74th, and 97th Amendments. The 42nd Amendment Act (1976), which made sweeping changes across the document, is often called the 'Mini-Constitution'.
A critical judicial limit on amendment power was set in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Supreme Court held that Parliament's constituent power under Article 368 cannot be used to alter the 'basic structure' of the Constitution.
Constitutions may be written (like the American) or unwritten (like the British). India's Constitution is the longest written constitution in the world — a comprehensive, elaborate, and highly detailed document.
Four reasons for the Constitution's bulk:
Unlike most constitutions, India's document incorporates not just governance principles but also detailed administrative provisions, and matters that other democracies leave to ordinary legislation or political convention.
Dr B.R. Ambedkar proudly stated that the Constitution was framed after 'ransacking all the known constitutions of the world.' The most significant single source is the Government of India Act, 1935 — over 250 of its provisions were incorporated, and more than half the Constitution's provisions are identical to or closely derived from it.
| Source | Features Borrowed |
|---|---|
| Govt. of India Act, 1935 | Federal scheme, Governor's office, Judiciary, Public Service Commissions, Emergency provisions, administrative details |
| British Constitution | Parliamentary government, Rule of Law, legislative procedure, single citizenship, Cabinet system, prerogative writs, parliamentary privileges, bicameralism |
| US Constitution | Fundamental Rights, judicial review, independence of judiciary, impeachment of President, removal of SC/HC judges, office of Vice-President |
| Irish Constitution | Directive Principles of State Policy, nomination to Rajya Sabha, method of presidential election |
| Canadian Constitution | Strong Centre in federation, residuary powers with Centre, appointment of Governors by Centre, advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court |
| Australian Constitution | Concurrent List, freedom of trade and commerce, joint sitting of Parliament |
| Weimar Constitution (Germany) | Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency |
The structural part derives largely from the 1935 Act; the philosophical part (Fundamental Rights, DPSPs) from American and Irish constitutions; and the political part (Cabinet Government, executive-legislature relations) from the British Constitution.
A rigid constitution requires a special amendment procedure (e.g., USA), while a flexible constitution can be amended like ordinary legislation (e.g., Britain). India's Constitution is neither purely rigid nor purely flexible — it is a deliberate synthesis of both.
Under Article 368, the amendment process operates at three levels:
This tiered system allows the Constitution to be firm on fundamental matters while remaining adaptable on administrative details.
The Constitution establishes a federal system with the classic federal features: dual government, division of powers, written and supreme Constitution, constitutional rigidity, independent judiciary, and bicameralism.
However, it also contains strong unitary or centralising elements: a powerful Centre, single Constitution, single citizenship, integrated judiciary, Centre's power to appoint Governors, All-India Services, and comprehensive emergency provisions.
Significantly, the word 'Federation' does not appear anywhere in the Constitution. Article 1 describes India as a 'Union of States', conveying two things:
India opted for the British Westminster model of parliamentary government rather than the American presidential system. The key distinction: the parliamentary system rests on cooperation and coordination between the legislature and executive, while the presidential system operates on separation of powers.
The parliamentary system — also called 'responsible government' or 'cabinet government' — is established at both the Centre and in the states.
India vs. Britain: India's Parliament is not sovereign (unlike the British Parliament); India has an elected head of state (republic), while Britain has a hereditary monarch. The role of the Prime Minister has grown so dominant in practice that political scientists often call it a 'Prime Ministerial Government.'
Britain's system is associated with parliamentary sovereignty and the USA's with judicial supremacy. India strikes a balance between the two.
One key distinction from the USA: India's Constitution uses 'procedure established by law' (Article 21) rather than 'due process of law' as in the US Constitution, making the scope of judicial review narrower in India than in the USA.
India has a single, unified judiciary with the Supreme Court at the apex, High Courts at the state level, and District/Subordinate Courts below them. This single hierarchy enforces both central and state laws — unlike the USA, where federal and state judiciaries operate in parallel.
The Supreme Court serves as:
Mechanisms ensuring judicial independence:
Part III of the Constitution guarantees six Fundamental Rights to citizens (originally seven; the Right to Property under Article 31 was removed by the 44th Amendment, 1978, and is now a legal right under Article 300-A):
Key characteristics:
Dr Ambedkar described DPSPs as a 'novel feature' of the Constitution. Enumerated in Part IV, they are classified into three categories:
Purpose: To promote social and economic democracy and build a welfare state.
Critical distinction from Fundamental Rights: DPSPs are non-justiciable — courts cannot enforce them for their violation. Yet the Constitution declares them 'fundamental in the governance of the country' and imposes a moral obligation on the state to apply them. The real sanction behind them is political — public opinion.
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that the Constitution rests on a 'balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.'
The original Constitution had no Fundamental Duties. They were added by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, during the internal emergency (1975–77), based on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee. The 86th Amendment Act, 2002 added one more duty, bringing the total to eleven.
Location: Part IV-A, Article 51-A
Examples of duties: To respect the Constitution, national flag, and national anthem; to protect sovereignty, unity, and integrity; to promote brotherhood; to preserve composite cultural heritage; etc.
Like DPSPs, Fundamental Duties are non-justiciable — they serve as reminders of civic obligations alongside constitutional rights.
India is constitutionally a secular state — it has no official religion. The term 'secular' was explicitly added to the Preamble by the 42nd Amendment, 1976.
Indian vs. Western Secularism: The Western concept implies strict separation of church and state. India's multireligious society makes this inapplicable. India follows a positive secularism — equal respect and protection for all religions. The Constitution also abolished communal representation (reservation of legislative seats on religious lines, which existed under the 1909, 1919, and 1935 Acts).
Every citizen aged 18 or above has the right to vote for the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies, without discrimination on the basis of caste, race, religion, sex, literacy, or wealth.
The voting age was reduced from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1988 (operative 1989).
Significance:
(For reference: Women received voting rights in USA in 1920, Britain in 1928, France in 1945, and Switzerland as late as 1971.)
Despite a federal structure and dual polity (Centre and states), India provides for only one citizenship — Indian citizenship — for all persons.
Contrast with the USA: In the US, every person is simultaneously a citizen of the nation and of their particular state, carrying dual rights from both levels of government.
In India, all citizens — irrespective of the state they were born in or reside in — enjoy the same political and civil rights throughout the country. Exceptions exist for certain tribal areas and (formerly) Jammu & Kashmir.
Beyond the three organs of government, the Constitution establishes independent bodies as bulwarks of democracy:
Their independence is protected through security of tenure, fixed service conditions, and expenses charged to the Consolidated Fund of India.
The Constitution contains elaborate emergency provisions to protect sovereignty, unity, integrity, and security of the country. Three distinct types of emergencies are recognised:
| Type | Article | Ground |
|---|---|---|
| National Emergency | 352 | War, external aggression, or armed rebellion (originally 'internal disturbance'; changed by 44th Amendment, 1978) |
| State Emergency (President's Rule) | 356 / 365 | Failure of constitutional machinery in a state / non-compliance with central directions |
| Financial Emergency | 360 | Threat to financial stability or credit of India |
Effect: During an emergency, the Centre becomes all-powerful, states come under central control, and the federal structure effectively converts to a unitary one — without any formal constitutional amendment. This transformation is a unique feature of the Indian Constitution.
Originally, the Constitution provided for a dual polity (Centre and states). The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts (1992) added a third tier of local government — a feature unique in comparative constitutional law.
The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act (2011) elevated co-operative societies to constitutional status through three changes:
Parliament has jurisdiction over multi-state co-operatives; state legislatures govern the rest.
The Constitution has faced several criticisms — some superficial, others more substantive:
Critics call it a 'bag of borrowings' or a 'patchwork' of world constitutions with nothing original. Ambedkar's response: No constitution can be truly novel at this stage in constitutional history; what matters is adapting borrowed features to suit local needs and avoid their defects.
N. Srinivasan and Sir Ivor Jennings observed that it is closely derived — even textually — from the Government of India Act, 1935. P.R. Deshmukh called it 'essentially the 1935 Act with adult franchise added.' Ambedkar's response: There is no shame in borrowing; no one holds a patent on constitutional ideas. His regret was only that most provisions borrowed from the 1935 Act relate to administrative details rather than principles.
Critics like K. Hanumanthaiya argued that the Constitution does not reflect India's political traditions and spirit, making it unsuitable for Indian conditions. Lokanath Misra called it a 'slavish imitation of the west.'
The Constitution was criticised for not building upon village panchayats as Gandhiji envisioned. K. Hanumanthaiya stated it was precisely the kind of Constitution Gandhi 'did not want.'
Sir Ivor Jennings found it too long and complicated. H.V. Kamath, a Constituent Assembly member, humorously noted that like the Assembly's elephant emblem, the Constitution too was 'the bulkiest in the world.'
Ivor Jennings and H.K. Maheswari criticised it for being excessively legalistic and litigation-inviting. P.R. Deshmukh lamented that it reads like a 'law manual' rather than a 'vibrating, pulsating, life-giving' socio-political document.
Next action
You can practise without an account. Sign in first if you want this chapter saved.
This chapter covers Introduction, 1. Lengthiest Written Constitution, 2. Drawn from Various Sources, 3. Blend of Rigidity and Flexibility, 4. Federal System with Unitary Bias. It is organized as revision-ready notes followed by a linked practice quiz.
For What Sets India's Constitution Apart: Federal Flexibility, Rights Architecture, and the Republican Vision, focus on definitions, dates, places, institutions, distinguishing features, and factual comparisons in the chapter. Then use the quiz to check recall and identify gaps.
Use the What Sets India's Constitution Apart: Federal Flexibility, Rights Architecture, and the Republican Vision chapter headings to organize an answer framework. Connect causes, consequences, comparisons, examples, and evidence wherever the notes provide them instead of memorizing isolated facts.
| Soviet Constitution (USSR/Russia) | Fundamental Duties, ideal of justice (social, economic, political) in Preamble |
| French Constitution | Republic, ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity in Preamble |
| South African Constitution | Procedure for constitutional amendment, election of Rajya Sabha members |
| Japanese Constitution | Procedure established by law |